In checking in on comments and stats, I’ve found only a very limited number of readers interested in my reading reviews, and those few are not interested in the personal nor the writing exercises. Am I needy? A whiner? Probably. But the fact that only one person bothered to click on my project link in a prior post tells me something. And the fact that this problem seems to come up on a regular basis with me demands decision–not mere repetition of, okay, I’ll keep plodding along ’cause two people said I should.
What to do?
Well, I’m not going to close shop with a year paid in advance, but I believe some rethinking of my weblogs is called for, and while I’ll start planning for it now, it probably won’t be done until the first of next year. My big plans to be considered a literary weblog flopped, and even with the emphasis on literary analysis, somehow I’ve not been selected as an official literary site although many I see that are include more personal entries, or are mere "link-on-logs" which point to the biggies.
On the other hand, I’m no longer interested in blogging my daily routine nor my personal ups and downs exclusively. These things inevitably creep in, as I am basically honest and open–at least written word-wise–but I’ve tried to keep them to a minimum or include if they relate to what I’m reading or doing in literature, or, when they just can’t be stoppered up, present them metaphorically.
While it has often been pointed out that we writers are supposed to write for ourselves, this is pure hogwash. Everyone needs to be appreciated. We’re not 16-year old diary keepers; we’re writers and we need an audience. Is an actor, dancer, singer content spending his talent in front of a mirror? If we wrote merely for our own self-satisfaction or need, we can more easily write straight into Windows Word and the heck with sharing or hoping for acknowledgement. Weblogs do, however, seem to provide a certain discipline of meeting false deadlines by their nature of being dated and read–or at least, scanned. But a weblog can also be unpublished and private, so that only wandering Googlers ever, to their disgust when they’re trying to do research or find porn, mistakenly plop into someone’s weblog world.
So the paths diverge. Maybe a less down-home and more professional literary analysis will be one track, and another non-fiction creative writing. In the meantime, I’ll do my best to keep up with the road I’m on and not take lack of interest personally. We all have something to say, and I need to realize that with the explosion of good writing seen in a growing weblog community, we just can’t take the time to read them all but instead have the glorious option of selecting those of particular interest or quality. I think that one of the best elements of a weblog is the ability to comment, and I long ago gave up the fear of it seeming too much like leaving a calling card and comment often as a means of showing support, opinion, encouragement or appreciation. The field is constantly changing, and with it, so too shall I.
Hi,
I found your blog from Chekhov’s Mistress. I’ve enjoyed reading your posts. I’m having similar problems in terms of response to book reviews (that’s one of the reasons why I haven’t really done as many, another reason is time). I think most people have very short attention spans when it comes to the Internet. They want short, easily digestible entries. If the subject interests them, they’ll read it, if it doesn’t, they ignore it.
I know how you feel about being ignored. I just started my blog in August, and I sent a few emails out to some of the big-name blogs about my site, only to get ignored.
Have you thought about contacting some of the more academic blogs, like the Valve, the Literary Professor, Amardeep Singh? I think the readers on those sites would probably appreciate your content more.
It’s a conondrum. I pretend that the lack of comments and readers don’t believe me, but then I seethe when I see 15 to 20 comments when someone posts about her dog puking on her rug.
It’s a cult thing and a personality thing. Shorter the better; more photos the better; and if you get picked up by one of the power houses, you’ll be flooded with readers.
What to do? Nothing more than what we do now: write what we like. After all, who else is going to publish us.
Looking forward to OTTO.
I think you’re both right on the length and image ideas, and must admit, that unless something really is well written or holds my attention, I’m normally running in scan mode myself.
Excellent weblog you have, Michelle, makes me wish I lived closer to the City. So much happening there and it looks like you have a handle on it. I think you should get a good following–it just takes some time.
Loretta, I’ve e-mailed you re your copies of otto #2 which I’m sitting dressed and shod and ready to run to the printers to pick up and collate any moment.